Jeff-Vogel

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Don't Ask Questions Until the Player Can Answer

Posted on 13:01 by Unknown
When I started writing fantasy role-playing games for a living, I did a lot of dumb things. Since then, it's been a painfully slow process figuring out how to be less dumb. Every time I start a new game, there is a point where I go, "Wait. Why don't I do this thing this new way? In fact, why haven't I always done it that way?" And then I slap my forehead. Hopefully, it hurts.

One of my new, hard-earned rules of design has to do with training your characters. And, since it seems like every game and its cousin has some sort of level-gaining and stat-building these days, I think the rule is getting more relevant every day:

The number of decisions you have to make to build your character should be proportional to the amount of time you've spent playing the game. The more you play, the more you should decide.

Or, to put it another way ...

Whenever you make a decision about your character at the very beginning of the game, you are answering a question that hasn't even been asked yet.


So design wonks, get ready. Here is an example from my game Avernum, released in 1999. I will compare it to the rewritten version, Avernum: Escape From the Pit, out later this year. (And this will also double as a little taste of a preview of the new game, for those who care.)

The Bad Way I Did It Before

Avernum is an old school role-playing game. There are a lot of skills you can train to make your character stronger. There are the base attributes (Strength, Intelligence, Dexterity, Endurance) and regular skills (Swords, Spells, Lore, etc). You start out with a bunch of skill points, and you get more with each level. You should spend these on skills.



You start out with a ton of skill points, so that you can majorly customize your character from the beginning. You can use skill points to increase base attributes or regular skills, but the base attributes are expensive. However, it could break the system if a player put a huge amount of skill points in certain skills. To limit this, I made increasing a skill cost more skill points the higher you trained it. At high levels, you might have to save up for two or three levels to get enough skill points to raise a major skill one point.

Think about this. It's a system where the more you play and learn about the challenges facing you, the less you can do to customize your characters. You have to make most of the big changes at low level, when skills are cheap. Worse, it was necessary to increase the base attributes to survive (especially Endurance, which increases health), but they were so expensive that doing so required careful planning. As a result of this mess, many players had problems with getting halfway through the game and finding that they were not strong enough to proceed. These players got angry at me, and justifiably so.

There was also a traits system. Traits are special character qualities, some positive, some negative, that affected your characters. They could make you better at spells, more vulnerable to disease, and so on. Good traits came with a penalty to experience earned. Bad traits gave you a bonus. You could have at most two traits.

And here's the awesome part. You could only pick these traits at the beginning of the game, and you couldn't change them. Major decisions that affect how you play the entire game, and you make them before you've even fought one monster. It's very hardcore and old school. By which I mean that it's mean-spirited and unnecessarily punitive.

The Better Way I Do It Now

There are still base attributes (unchanged), skills (mostly unchanged), and traits (an all-new, very long list).

When you make your characters, you can increase five skills and pick one trait from the long list. This is far, FAR less customization at the beginning than was allowed in Avernum. Because of this, many gamers will try to make a party, think I have completely dumbed down the system, and ragequit. Price of doing business.



But then, when you gain a level, a base attribute goes up by one point. It's different each level, so every four levels each attribute has gone up by one. In addition, each level you can choose one attribute to increase by one. This allows a lot of character customization while making sure all skills go up gradually so that you won't be hamstrung by completely neglecting an attribute.

Each level, you can also increase two different skills by one point. Thus, you never stop being able to shape your characters. As you get a better idea of the challenges you are facing, you can mold your characters to enable them to proceed.

Finally, every other level, you can pick one trait from the long list. The number of available choices starts out small (to keep from confusing new players) and grows dramatically as you proceed. You will eventually have a lot of traits. Some of them give simple bonuses to your spells or attacks, while others (like Backstab or Swordmage) will affect how you actually play your character.

I plan to take a lot of heat because I allow fewer choices early on, but overall you make more decisions to mold your character in the new system than in the old system, and there are more ways to customize a character. The change means that you make a larger percentage of the decisions later on. As it should be.

Of Course, There Is No Way To Win

I have often observed that people hate change. I have tried to make a more friendly system that provides more customization, but a lot of people will be angry about the loss of the old system (which has been in place for a very long time). I can totally understand this, but I still need to always strive to make things better.

Also, while the old system made it very possible to build a party that would find itself stuck and unable to proceed. Some players actually like that. To them, the challenge of avoiding that fate is part of the game, and the threat of a failed party adds excitement to the game. For them, I can only suggest playing on Torment difficulty. It will provide ample possibility of horrible failure.

But I'm very happy with the new system. I think it allows players to answer the questions the game poses when they understand what those questions truly are. And now I enter beta testing and the actual balancing of the new system. And that, of course, is when the suffering truly begins.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in advice, avernum, design, teh casualz | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Some Morbid Reading For Your Day
    As the years passed, I have seen a lot of Indie developers rocket past me, just because they are more talented and courageous than I am. Stu...
  • Katawa Shoujo, Sex Stuff in Games, and Choosing What You Are Allowed To See
    What I expected: Weirdo smut. What I got: A little box full of therapy. This is one of those blog posts it's really hard to hit the Publ...
  • The Joy and Despair of Writing These Stupid Games.
    Please, Charlie Bucket, save me from this hell of my own devising! I've been in 80-hour-week crunch for 15 months! "We are the musi...
  • A New Article on IGN RPG Vault.
    My latest View From the Bottom article, the first in a long time, is now up on IGN RPG Vault. It's called "We're All Charity Ca...
  • Why We Need Video Game Critics, Even If the Whole Topic Is Boring
    Video games need more of this ... We've reached the point where video games have a huge place in our culture, and yet most of them are ....
  • Marketing, Dumb Luck, and the Popping of the Indie Bubble.
    This article is kind of depressing, so here is a puppy hugging a kitten. Sigh. I hate writing articles like this. Even if I’m right (and I r...
  • "Whom" Is Dumb.
    This will be one of those blog posts where I go and court controversy. No, it won't be about software piracy. Something worse. I'm g...
  • More Arguing About Women In Video Games. But This Time the Women Can Beat You Up.
    Frankly, I want my avatar to look more like this ... The argument about how women should be portrayed in video games rages inexplicably on. ...
  • We Finally Released Avadon 2.
    Keeping the single-player, turn-based, story-heavy flame alive. After two years of development, we have finally released our first all-new g...
  • Mass Effect 3 Review: The Good Stuff
    Since I write so much in this space about fantasy role-playing games in general and Bioware stuff in particular, I feel kind of lame for say...

Categories

  • 10000 hours
  • addiction
  • adolescent power fantasy
  • advice
  • android
  • apple
  • avadon
  • avernum
  • back in the day
  • bees
  • bioware
  • blatant pr
  • books
  • boring
  • both artsy AND fartsy
  • braid
  • business stuff
  • cowardice
  • criticism
  • death
  • design
  • destroying my employability in the game industry
  • developer diary
  • diablo
  • dragon age
  • drm
  • dry boring stuff
  • dungeons and dragons
  • ego-massage
  • entertaining atrocities
  • everyone will hate this
  • fad
  • fart
  • flamebait
  • flumph
  • games
  • geneforge
  • gold rush
  • grand theft auto
  • grumpy gamer
  • guitar hero
  • high-functioning alcoholics
  • humble bundle
  • humor
  • i act like i am smart
  • i am a parent if you can believe that
  • i am completely freaking out
  • i am very old
  • i hate art
  • i suck at pr
  • i've wasted my life
  • indie
  • internet hate machine
  • interview
  • introduction
  • introvision
  • ipad
  • iphone
  • jetpacks
  • l2pn00b
  • linking to things i like
  • loser
  • losing lots of money
  • mass effect
  • microsoft
  • minecraft
  • mourning
  • movie
  • nerd
  • nerdjoy
  • nerdrage
  • nethergate
  • nobel prize in awesomeness
  • not about games
  • not wrong to expect to be paid for your work
  • omigodomigodomigod
  • penny arcade
  • physical activity
  • piracy
  • ponies
  • pricing
  • pubic hair and semen
  • queen of fun
  • ranting
  • review
  • rock band
  • rpgs
  • saints row
  • sale
  • sales
  • sales figures
  • shameless self-promotion
  • shareware
  • skyrim
  • something for the ladies
  • spiderweb software
  • squid
  • ssssssss BOOM
  • star trek
  • steam
  • still alive
  • stories are for losers and squares
  • tasty meat
  • tech support
  • teh casualz
  • testing
  • that guy
  • the culture war
  • think of the children
  • tldr
  • travel journal
  • union
  • VEGAS
  • view from the bottom
  • watchmen
  • what cruddy graphics
  • whistling past graveyard
  • whomwhomwhom
  • why did my computer just melt
  • work i didn't get paid for
  • world of goo
  • xbox
  • you made my virtual pet starve you jerk
  • zombies

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (18)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
  • ►  2012 (23)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (34)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ▼  August (5)
      • Snarky Review: L.A. Noire
      • I Don't Finish Games Because I Am Old
      • Avadon Is Out On Steam!
      • I Love Being In the Future
      • Don't Ask Questions Until the Player Can Answer
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (39)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2009 (53)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile